This video is a part of Conservation Strategy Fund’s collection of environmental economics lessons and was made possible thanks to the support of Jon Mellberg and family. This series is for people who want to learn – or review – the economics of conservation. The Valuation series will look at the process of estimating the value of an ecosystem. This video takes a closer look at the method of valuing ecosystem services through surveying individuals and choice modeling where individuals are presented with a choice set and which scenario one would be willing to pay for.
To follow this series, subscribe to our YouTube channel. For more information on these and other trainings from Conservation Strategy Fund, check out: Previous videos in this series were made possible by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the Marcia Brady Tucker Foundation.
Nguồn: https://bannhadian.com.vn
Xem thêm bài viết khác: https://bannhadian.com.vn/luat/
Xem thêm Bài Viết:
- Điểm mới trong Luật đất đai 2013 – Luật sư Nguyễn Văn Hậu | ĐTMN 021014
- Mua nhầm đất khai hoang chuyển đất ở được không|Phạm Văn Nam
- Luật sư Tuấn trả lời câu hỏi độc giả về tranh chấp đất đai | Số 1
- Tổng kết khoá học Luật Lao động chuyên sâu tháng 6/2019
- Đóng Thuế Nhà Đất Hằng Năm Ở Mỹ Ra Sao !!!
Very interesting, but you should speak faster, or some people may actually be able to follow you.
Wow! I am about to cite this video in my paper. Wonderfully explained. Thank you.
Informative but too much fast.
Badiya
It is very essential video but I need blocking of choice sets to reduce the number of choice set cards to be provided for respondents.
Excellent video. Was the link for the Fractional factorial design removed?
AWESOME EXAM PREP, THANK YOU
very useful
Where is the link to how the Fractional factorial design was done?
thanks
Great video! It explains the CE methodology with just the right amount of detail for a layman to understand. I can't see the link you refer to @4:55 that explains the fractional factorial methodology in more depth. Has it been removed?
Thanks, Jesse!